Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Holly, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 285-300 (1981)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988120080601
© 1981 Urban Studies Journal Limited

City System Behaviour and Corporate Influence: The Headquarters Location of US Industrial Firms, 1955-75

John D. Stephens

Department of Geography, the University of California at Los Angeles

Brian P. Holly

Department of Geography at Kent State University, Kent, Ohio

Research on the locational patterns of corporate headquarters in the United States shows that corporate control has become less concentrated over the past 25 years. Analysis of the largest 500 industrial corporations reveals a trend toward a more balanced distribution on a regional basis but a greater degree of stability within the rank size hierarchy. The largest cities, regardless of their location, tend to be the steering points in the economic system. Although corporate headquarters have been decentralising to the suburbs, they are able to do so without surrendering their accessibility to specialised contact networks, ancillary business services, and inter-metropolitan transportation networks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
M. R. Matthew
Towards a general theory of suburban office morphology in North America
Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 1993; 17(4): 471 - 489.
[PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
M. L. Moss
Telecommunications, World Cities, and Urban Policy
Urban Stud, December 1, 1987; 24(6): 534 - 546.
[PDF]