Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 267-283 (1981)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988120080591
© 1981 Urban Studies Journal Limited

National Urban Development Strategies in Developing Countries

Harry W. Richardson

State University of New York at Albany

A national urban development strategy may be important in increasing the welfare of rural as well as urban dwellers. Ten prototype strategies are analyzed: no intervention; policentric primate city region development; leapfrog decentralization within core regions; countermagnets; rural service centers; regional metropolis and subsystem development ; growth centers; development axes; provincial capitals; and secondary cities. The choice among these (including hybrid strategies) depends heavily on country-specific conditions. Alternative approaches to slowing down primacy, a common element of many strategies, are evaluated. Distinctions between the promotion of secondary cities and traditional growth centre policies are discussed. The paper also examines policy instruments such as migration controls and subsidies, infrastructure investments, fiscal locational incentives, administrative decentralization and local fiscal reform. But corrections for the implicit spatial impacts of macro and sectoral policies may be more critical. Finally, the success of a national urban development strategy depends upon long-term political commitment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. G. Mahayni
A Decentralized Approach to Urbanization: The Case of Syria
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1990; 9(2): 117 - 125.
[Abstract]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
P. M. Townroe
The Case for Experimental, Adaptive Restraint Policies in Developing Nation Metropolitan Areas
International Regional Science Review, August 1, 1989; 12(2): 131 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
H.-Y. Lee
Growth Determinants in the Core-Periphery of Korea
International Regional Science Review, August 1, 1989; 12(2): 147 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
H. Lubell
Third World Urbanization and International Assistance
Urban Stud, February 1, 1984; 21(1): 1 - 13.
[PDF]