Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danson, M.W.
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, J.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 193-209 (1980)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988020080351
© 1980 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Inner City Employment Problem in Great Britain, 1952-76: a Shift-Share Approach

M.W. Danson

Department of Social and Economic Research and the Centre for Urban and Regional Research at Glasgow University

W.F. Lever

Department of Social and Economic Research and the Centre for Urban and Regional Research at Glasgow University

J.F. Malcolm

Department of Social and Economic Research and the Centre for Urban and Regional Research at Glasgow University

Employment data for 1952, 1963, 1968, 1973 and 1976 for the British conurbations are analysed to demonstrate the extent of job loss in the inner city areas and the growth of the outer city areas. Shift-share analysis is used at a 116-sector level of disaggregation to identify the structural and residual components of this employment change. It is clear that the inner cities consistently have a positive structural component so that their poor employment performance cannot be attributed to sectoral mix. The outer areas generally had a less favourable structure so that their positive residual components reflect a 'better than average performance'. This disparity between inner and outer city areas cannot be explained by short distance relocation. Most industries appear to be affected by the inner city problems as measured by the residual component.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
C. Jensen-Butler
Rural Industrialisation in Denmark and the Role of Public Policy
Urban Stud, August 1, 1992; 29(6): 881 - 904.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
T. Bovaird
Local Economic Development and the City
Urban Stud, May 1, 1992; 29(3-4): 343 - 368.
[PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
M.G. Coombes, D.J. Storey, R. Watson, and P. Wynarczyk
The Influence of Location upon Profitability and Employment Change in Small Companies
Urban Stud, October 1, 1991; 28(5): 723 - 734.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
K. J. Button and D. W. Pearce
Infrastructure Restoration as a Tool for Stimulating Urban Renewal The Glasgow Canal
Urban Stud, December 1, 1989; 26(6): 559 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. A. Henderson
The Employment Performance of Established Manufacturing Industry in the Scottish New Towns
Urban Stud, August 1, 1984; 21(3): 295 - 315.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. Elias and G. Keogh
Industrial Decline and Unemployment in the Inner City Areas of Great Britain: a Review of the Evidence
Urban Stud, February 1, 1982; 19(1): 1 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]