Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vipond, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 131-138 (1980)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988020080301

Intra-Urban Unemployment Differentials in Sydney, 1971

Joan Vipond

Department of Economics, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia

This paper analyses intra-urban unemployment differentials among male and female workers in Sydney in 1971. Neo-classical models of the labour market and urban development provide the theoretical background. Comparisons are made with UK studies which suggest that high unemployment in inner city areas can be explained either by the fact that more 'unemployables' live in such areas (a supply oriented explanation) or by the suburbanisation of jobs (a demand-oriented explanation). In Sydney there was a clearly defined spatial pattern in unemployment rates that was the same as that found in UK studies - the nearer a location to the core of Sydney, the higher was the unemployment rate among male residents. However, no spatial pattern could be detected in female unemployment rates. Supply and demand explanations are suggested for this absence of high inner city unemployment among women. It is concluded that policies designed to cure male unemployment in inner areas could have harmful effects on women's employment opportunities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
D. Houston
Employability, Skills Mismatch and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan Labour Markets
Urban Stud, February 1, 2005; 42(2): 221 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
I. Gordon and I. Molho
Women in the Labour Markets of the London Region: A Model of Dependence and Constraint
Urban Stud, October 1, 1985; 22(5): 367 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Vipond
The Intra-Urban Unemployment Gradient: The Influence of Location on Unemployment
Urban Stud, November 1, 1984; 21(4): 377 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]