This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Diamond, D. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Income and Residential Location: Muth Revisited

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

In Cities and Housing, Muth modeled residential location by income in terms of the conflicting desires for a low price of housing and access to CBD. This paper expands Muth's model to include in the location decision locational amenities other than access. Land values around Chicago are then used to estimate the income elasticities of the bids for access and five other amenities. The results indicate that the value of access may rise more rapidly with income than Muth expected and that, in the absence of other amenities and a durable housing stock, higher income residents would live closer to the CBD than low-income residents. Furthermore, other amenities may be important determinants of residential location patterns.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. S. Goldstein Recent Developments in Urban Economics American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 1980; 24(2): 228 - 276.